US Army – Forrestal Memorial Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:59:28 +0000 en-US hourly 1 US Army – Forrestal Memorial 32 32 The US Army’s first medium-range missile battery arrives in FY23 with 3 to follow Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:36:41 +0000

WASHINGTON – The U.S. military plans to deploy its first medium-range mobile missile battery no later than the end of FY2023 with three more batteries to follow, according to FY22 budget justification documents.

Having a huge portfolio of range capabilities in the Pacific offers a wide range of options as there are so many different locations to fire missiles from, Brigadier. Gen. John Rafferty, who is in charge of Long Range Precision Fire Modernization (LRPF), told Defense News in an interview last year. Mixing and matching ranges from a wide variety of locations “creates an incredible dilemma for the enemy,” he said.

The military was successful in starting the effort between budget requests with approximately $ 88 million added through congressional appropriations in fiscal year 21 and is requesting $ 286.46 million for fiscal year 22, a critical year for capacity development.

The service has previously awarded Lockheed Martin a contract to develop and build a ground launch system for the US Navy’s Standard Missile-6 and Tomahawk missiles as an MRC solution.

According to the documents, the military plans to use FY22 funding to deploy the prototype battery, which includes integration work and the purchase of equipment and other materials to manufacture the system and perform the qualification at the level of the components and system.

The effort is being led by the Army’s Office of Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies (RCCTO), but once the first battery is deployed, the program will be transferred to the Army’s Missile and Mission Program Executive Office. space.

In Exercise 22, the military will assemble both the MRC launcher payload deployment system and the first battery operations center (BOC) for the first battery, according to budget documents.

A battery will consist of four launchers and one BOC, according to the documents, but the number and distribution of missiles included in the battery are classified.

The military plans to spend $ 46.5 million on the launch system, $ 100.2 million on ground support equipment and $ 139.74 million on missiles in FY 22.

A system integration and verification is scheduled for Q3 of FY22, followed by initial commissioning and training for the first unit starting in Q1 of FY23 and ending in Q2 of FY24.

The military will request a version to deploy the system in the third quarter of FY23, according to the document schedule, and will perform an SM-6 test and a Tomahawk test also in the third quarter of FY23.

Source link

]]> 0
Stars and Stripes – Pentagon orders withdrawal of air defense systems and troops from Middle East Sun, 20 Jun 2021 07:23:20 +0000

A High Altitude Terminal Area Defense Weapon System, or THAAD. (Adan Cazarez / US Army)

The United States is reducing air defense systems and force levels in the Middle East as the Biden administration realigns its military position to focus on fighting China and Russia.

Cmdr. Pentagon spokeswoman Jessica L. McNulty confirmed the plans but did not provide specific details, after the Wall Street Journal reported Eight Patriot missile batteries were withdrawn from countries including Iraq, Kuwait, Jordan and Saudi Arabia on Friday.

A high-altitude terminal area defense system, or THAAD, has also been withdrawn from Saudi Arabia and fighter jet squadrons have been reduced, unnamed administration officials told the news agency. Troops have also been cut in Iraq, where the United States has already halved its presence to 2,500 earlier this year, according to the report.

“The Defense Secretary has ordered the commander of the US Central Command to withdraw certain forces and capabilities, mainly air defense, from the region this summer,” McNulty said in an email to Stars and Stripes on Saturday. “Some of these assets have returned to the United States for much needed maintenance and repairs. Some of them will be deployed in other regions.

The Pentagon is working to make sure high-demand assets are ready for emergencies, she said. Citing coordination with regional partners and operational security concerns, she said the Pentagon would not provide details on the locations, arrangements or timing of the withdrawals.

But officials told the Journal that the cuts started earlier this month and came mainly from Saudi Arabia. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin informed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of the withdrawal in a phone call on June 2, officials told the newspaper.

“The decision was made in close coordination with host nations and in the interest of preserving our ability to meet our security commitments,” McNulty said.

The realignment of forces comes as the United States continues to end its two-decade war in Afghanistan and seeks to shift its military focus from counterinsurgency to strong competing rivals, primarily China.

Some Patriot systems, fighter squadrons, and thousands more troops were sent to the region under the Trump administration in late 2019, after Iran-backed Houthi militants attacked a Saudi oil field.

More batteries and troops were dispatched in January 2020 after Iran fired ballistic missiles at al-Asad airbase and a compound in northern Erbil where US troops were housed. A few days earlier, a US drone strike in Baghdad had killed a senior Iranian military official, Major General Qassem Soleimani.

Tensions between the United States and Iran escalated following Washington’s withdrawal from an Obama-era international nuclear deal with Tehran and as the Trump administration sought to pressure Iran to let him renegotiate it.

But Pentagon officials see a reduced threat from Tehran as the Biden administration focuses on negotiating a return of the United States to the 2015 pact, the Wall Street Journal reported. The latest withdrawal follows the removal of at least three Patriot systems earlier this year.

Former defense officials told the Journal circumstances have changed since the United States decided to increase its defenses in the region.

“As Saudi Arabia has improved its own defensive capabilities and the United States seeks to resolve tensions with Iran using diplomatic tools, this move makes sense,” said Kathryn Wheelbarger, former secretary. Acting Defense Assistant under the Trump administration and colleague. at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Meanwhile, Iranian-backed militias continue to pose a threat to US forces in Iraq, where they have been blamed for dozens of rocket attacks targeting bases housing US troops and contractors. In recent months, militias appear to have switched to using small, low-flying drones armed with explosives in Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

Patriot batteries capable of shooting down ballistic missiles do not provide defense against small rockets or drones, but counter-rocket, artillery and mortar systems, or C-RAMs, deployed to protect anti-missile systems are capable of knocking down what has typically been Katyusha rocket barrages fired from makeshift trucks or ground launchers.

McNulty did not respond to whether the C-RAMs would remain in place in Iraq or what the United States is doing to strengthen its defenses against small drones.

Earlier in the week, however, the Marine Corps introduced its Integrated Marine Air Defense System, or MADIS, a vehicle-mounted low-altitude air defense system with counter-drone capabilities, deployed to Saudi Arabia, where the F / A-18D from the service Hornets have taken off from Prince Sultan Air Base in recent weeks.

Also this week, the military said the 4th Infantry Division became its first unit to undergo training at the docking station on countering small drones before deploying to CENTCOM. This included familiarization with the Small Mobile Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Integrated Defeat System, or M-LIDS, which is similar to MADIS.

The service will also send five-person teams of mobile trainers to be stationed in the area, the military said in a statement Monday.

The Pentagon is confident that its withdrawal will not have a negative impact on national security interests in the region, where the United States’ commitment is evident in its range of partnership activities, such as the sharing of intelligence, security assistance and overseas military sales, McNulty told Stars and Stripes.

The remaining land, air and naval footprint in the region, including tens of thousands of troops, is also large, she said.

“We maintain a robust position of strength in the region appropriate to the threat,” she said. “We also retain the ability to quickly return forces to the Middle East if conditions warrant. ”

Twitter: @chadgarland

Source link

]]> 0
General: “Terrorist Forest Fire” in March in Africa | Voice of America Sat, 19 Jun 2021 05:11:06 +0000

TAN-TAN, MOROCCO – A senior US general warned on Friday that the “forest fire of terrorism” was sweeping a swath of Africa and requiring the world’s attention. He spoke at the end of the large-scale war games led by the United States with American, African and European troops.

The African Lion War Games, which lasted nearly two weeks, spread across Morocco, a key US ally, with smaller games being held in Tunisia and Senegal. Annual exercises were skipped last year due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

General Stephen J. Townsend, head of the US Africa Command, praised the work being done in the joint operations and painted a grim picture of the threats besetting parts of Africa.

“I am concerned about the security situation in a strip of Africa,” from the Sahel region in the west to the Horn of Africa, Townsend told reporters. He noted deadly attacks carried out by militants linked to al-Qaida and the Islamic State and al-Shabab. “All are on the march,” he said.

African neighbors are helping governments deal with the threat, but, he added, “all of this does not seem to be enough to stop what I call … (the) terrorist forest fire sweeping across this country. region”.

The African Lion has seen more than 7,000 troops from seven countries and NATO jointly conduct air, land and sea exercises.

“This has contributed to our interoperability, to our joint capabilities and has provided a preparation and a good opportunity to strengthen cohesion between the forces,” said Major General Andrew Rohling, commander of Task Force Southern Europe. US Army in Africa. He spoke on Friday in the desert town of Tan-Tan.

There was a hitch initially, with Spain withdrawing from the war games, citing budgetary reasons. Press reports attributed the move to Spain’s poor relations with Morocco, a former key partner.

The two countries have been at loggerheads since Spain recruited the leader of the Polisario Front independence movement – Morocco’s number one enemy – for COVID-19 treatment in a Spanish hospital earlier this year. The Polisario is fighting for the independence of Western Sahara, a vast region that Morocco claims as its own.

During the exercise, Morocco conducted airborne operations near Western Sahara and not far from the Polisario refugee camps in Tindouf, neighboring Algeria.

“These activities were perfectly carried out and agreed between the two armies,” Moroccan Brigadier General Mohammed Jamil told The Associated Press.

Townsend, who was asked if any action had taken place in the disputed Western Sahara, was adamant: “I can confirm that is not the case.

The countries participating in the African Lion were the United States, Morocco, Tunisia, Senegal, Italy, the Netherlands and Great Britain. Observers from countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Niger and Mali were also present.

Source link

]]> 0
The Lebanese military is a key partner of the United States, but it’s not America’s job to fund it Fri, 18 Jun 2021 20:41:34 +0000

If you ever want to explain to someone what the philosopher Thomas Hobbes meant by “state of war”, just refer him to Lebanon during the Civil War of 1982.

Sectarian killings were rife across the country. Israeli tanks had reached Beirut and besieged the fighters of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. The Syrians had boots on the ground. And the Iranians were training terrorists in the Bekaa Valley and preparing to liberate Hezbollah. Lebanon had lost all semblance of sovereignty or order.

If you ever want to explain to someone what the philosopher Thomas Hobbes meant by “state of war”, just refer him to Lebanon during the Civil War of 1982.

Sectarian killings were rife across the country. Israeli tanks had reached Beirut and besieged the fighters of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. The Syrians had boots on the ground. And the Iranians were training terrorists in the Bekaa Valley and preparing to liberate Hezbollah. Lebanon had lost all semblance of sovereignty or order.

And yet, in this Hobbesian war of all against all, the United States somehow believed it could rebuild the Lebanese army. That the effort failed, resulting in the withdrawal of US troops in 1984 following deadly attacks on US personnel by pro-Iranian Lebanese Shiites, was all too predictable.

What was Washington thinking? Perhaps the success of the 1958 US intervention in Lebanon, which succeeded in pacifying the country and completing the election of a new Lebanese president, encouraged President Ronald Reagan to intervene. But surely American officials knew that the Lebanon of 1958 and the Lebanon of 1982 were very, very different.

The motivation for the United States to reshuffle the Lebanese Army in 1982 was driven by something far more fundamental, captured fairly well by Leslie Brown, a State Department official in charge of Lebanon at the time. “We had no choice,” he said Told the New York Times in 1984, “the concept was that the success of the entire Lebanese operation depended on the successful reconstruction of the Lebanese army”.

Almost four decades later, Washington finds itself in the same situation and with the same logic. The only thing that has changed is the fact that Lebanon is in much worse shape and is teetering on the edge.

The political debate in Washington, intensified under the Trump administration, over whether the United States should increase or even continue its support for the Lebanese military misses a fundamental point: for the United States, the force – including the commander, General Joseph Aoun, just this week desperately pleaded for help at a French-led donor conference – is the only game in town that can preserve the US position and influence in the country.

After all, Washington cannot work with the political leaders of Lebanon, because they have been shown time and time again to be greedy, corrupt, incompetent and indifferent to the plight of the Lebanese people. These are the same people who ruled the country for decades and brought it to ruin.

Lebanese civil society offers some hope, but it remains weak and fragmented.

The Lebanese military, on the other hand, is a viable American partner as it is the only remaining institution that is representative of all Lebanese religious communities and capable of functioning despite the national economic crisis. And the United States has a good leverage effect on the Lebanese military because it depends on American sponsorship to survive.

The lack of alternatives does not, of course, mean that the United States should give the Lebanese military a blank check or not care about the return on investment.

Fortunately, this feedback has been quite good.

More than a decade of partnership with the Lebanese military has yielded more impressive results than any other US military assistance program in the Middle East, despite structural challenges and powerful spoilers, both foreign and domestic, working to against the current. With American equipment, money and advice, the Lebanese army grew from a decrepit force mocked by its regional peers to a professional army that won the respect of Lebanese society and challenged the influence of Hezbollah. .

For the first time in Lebanon’s history, the country’s military was able to exercise increased control over the border with Syria, combat narcoterrorists and Sunni jihadists in the north, and deploy along the southern border dominated by Hezbollah.

Of course, things haven’t been perfect, and the military can do a lot better. But what critics of US aid reject is that the military does not set its own missions. Like any other normal army, it follows the orders of political leaders. And this leadership is unnecessary and divided. More than that, the ruling Lebanese oligarchs are unwilling to tackle the biggest security problem – Hezbollah’s armed status – out of fear or out of interest in preserving their political and economic equity in the system.

Thus, the fact that the Lebanese army has been able to accomplish many exploits despite the absence of a coherent civilian leadership is all the more remarkable. This is why US officials should not blame the Lebanese military for not doing enough to contain Hezbollah. Instead, they should hold all politicians accountable.

Without a doubt, for Lebanon to ever become a true state, Hezbollah must disarm. But pushing the Lebanese army to adopt a more aggressive stance towards it, especially without a societal consensus on this issue, is doomed to failure. The United States got more of its aid from the Lebanese military than it expected. This is not the question Washington should be debating.

The real thing that deserves serious political discussion is that if the United States cuts off the power or drastically decreases its aid to the Lebanese military, and as a result loses influence in Lebanon, what does that matter?

At a time when the United States is shifting less emphasis on the Middle East and shifting its attention to other priority regions, this is not a straightforward question to answer. Losing America’s grip in Lebanon essentially means ceding the country to Iran and possibly Russia, which has a firm presence alongside in Syria. A weak Lebanese army could also allow al Qaeda and the Islamic State to return to the country and regroup regionally.

Admittedly, these are bad results for the United States. But how prepared is the United States to treat Lebanon as a priority along with so many other competitors? Certainly, the reluctance of Lebanese leaders to reform and save the country from total disintegration does not make things easier for American officials.

In Lebanon, Washington has found the means, but perhaps not the ends.

Source link

]]> 0
Anduril turns American troops into “invincible technomancers”, says Palmer Luckey Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:12:06 +0000

Anduril founder Palmer Luckey announced Thursday that his start-up had raised a $ 450 million in funding, which will serve to “transform the allied fighters into invincible technomancers”. The company is now valued at $ 4.6 billion.

Luckey is best known for selling Oculus to Facebook in 2014 for $ 2 billion before being fired in 2017 amid controversy over his political donations and financial support for far-right groups. But his announcement of the new funding was unusual.

“We just raised $ 450 million in Series D funding for Anduril,” Luckey said on Twitter. “It will be used to transform American and Allied fighters into invincible technomancers who wield the power of autonomous systems to accomplish their mission safely. Our future roadmap will blow your mind, stay tuned!

Technomancers sometimes appear in post-modern role-playing video games and science fiction, often as some sort of wizard-like magical people with technological upgrades.

Anduril Technologies is a defense company that, among other things, provides border control technology, including towers with cameras and infrared sensors that use artificial intelligence to track movement, in states like Texas and California .

The company said it was able to deploy its artificial intelligence platform, called Lattice, in other locations, such as military bases in the United States, to help detect and follow instructions from other people and vehicles, including drones.

Elad Gil, who led the fundraising round, said on Thursday the company was unprepared for the growing number of threats and that companies like Anduril can help in a multitude of areas, from natural disasters to cyber attacks.

He said Anduril provides “networks of sensors, towers, drones and powerful software that tie it all together – whose potential uses include protecting our troops on base, defending our energy infrastructure, fighting against forest fires, the arrest of human traffickers, the creation of a “virtual border” (a rare bipartisan idea) and the fight against drug cartels. Many of these potential uses can directly save lives.

Other tech companies are working to make American troops more lethal. Microsoft, for example, won a military contract worth up to $ 21.9 billion in March to deliver special versions of its HoloLens augmented reality headsets to U.S. fighters.

Andreessen Horowitz, 8VC, Founders Fund, General Catalyst, Lux Capital, Valor Equity Partners and D1 Capital all participated in the round.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Source link

]]> 0
US Army fires autonomous launcher during Pacific-focused demonstration Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:59:40 +0000

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Army fired an autonomous launcher during a demonstration June 16 at Yuma Proving Ground, Ariz., Focused on how it could be deployed to eliminate enemy ships and other defensive systems as part of multidomain operations in the Indo-Pacific theater.

Conceptual video shows a C-130 transport plane landing on a runway on a Pacific island. The multidomain autonomous launcher (AML) exits the ramp of the C-130 while a high mobility artillery rocket system (HIMARS) exits the other aircraft. The two launchers deploy as an unmanned team to strategic points on the island. A launcher fires a Simulated Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), the future replacement of the Army’s Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), to strike an enemy ship detected in the nearby ocean. The other fires an extended-range version of the PrSM to take out an enemy air defense system located on an enemy-occupied island.

Once the missiles clear targets, the launchers return to the bellies of the C-130s and the planes take off while the US fighter jets deploy during the window of opportunity created by the destruction of these enemy targets.

In the demonstration, according to the brigadier. General John Rafferty, who is in charge of the Army’s Long Range Precision Fire Modernization (LRPF), the AML repeated the process and was then deployed to two more islands under the first scenario.

The hour and 15 minute mission was led by Soldiers by a HIMARS platoon from the 18th Field Artillery Brigade based out of Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Overall, the military fired seven rockets simulating the future range capability of the PrSM missile of approximately 500 kilometers at well beyond this distance and it also demonstrated a rocket capability at shorter range in the third. island scenario to reflect more tactical combat in support of divisions and corps, Rafferty told a few reporters during a phone call directly after the protest.

The AML is an adapted HIMARS with technology to include leader-follower autonomy, waypoint autonomous navigation and wire drive capability.

The scientific and technological effort came together several years ago when the LRPF cross-functional team within Army Futures Command joined the Command’s Aviation and Missile Center and Ground Vehicle Systems Center. Combat Capabilities Development Unit (DEVCOM) to develop the launcher prototype.

The AML is equipped with a remote launcher turret and fire control system that allows compatibility with current ammunition such as the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMRLS) and future weapons like the PrSM .

The demonstration showed soldiers who tried it that the autonomous launcher could help them transition from ongoing activities into operations that are dangerous or impossible to do with systems today.

Feedback showed soldiers believed the ability could keep them in combat longer and offered more protection and increased lethality, such as a deeper magazine, as the HIMARS cabin can be replaced to accommodate more ammunition.

“You can have all kinds of different missile configurations depending on the type of combat you want to get into,” Jeffrey Langhout, director of AvMC, said on the call with reporters. “One of the most important things it does is that it gives us more physical space without having to spend billions of dollars to buy a whole new launcher. This allows us to kind of use what we have and make some minor tweaks to it, giving us options to move forward no matter how the military chooses to go. ‘forward with the missile fleet.

This could include the use of missiles from other services, Langhout noted, and their integration into the launcher as well.

The program also makes use of technological efforts already under development within the military, such as the robotic technology core that will be used in future robotic combat vehicle capabilities, other mature technologies allowing the leader’s autonomy. – follower and combat machine interface.

The effort has cost around $ 10 million so far – some of which has been funded by Congress – to create the prototype and demonstrate its capabilities, Rafferty said.

The military has yet to decide whether an autonomous launcher will be part of the future force, but the demonstration marks a starting point. Rafferty said the military will continue to work with the INDO-PACOM theater task force to develop the concept and that the service will continue to evolve the technology along the way.

The service has received approval to move forward with a Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) and will partner with INDO-PACOM Combat Command and AvMC to explore the capability through early prototyping and participation in robust operational exercises in theater over the next several years.

The military will also spend the next year, Rafferty said, working on a transition deal with the home’s acquisition side to develop what could eventually become a record-breaking program. “We are not there yet. It is still quite early in the [science and technology] and this concept development was really meant to show our acquisition partners and AFC management what we think we can do and what could be.

Source link

]]> 0
DVIDS – News – Colombian Army trains at JRTC and talks to Southern Army Tue, 15 Jun 2021 21:40:00 +0000

The U.S. military can trace its training history with the Colombian Army (COLAR) to over 60 years ago, when U.S. Army Ranger officers developed the Lancero training program for COLAR in the mid-1990s. 1950. Since then, the initiative has resulted in one of the longest individual professional military relationships with the US Army South, taking the initiative to maintain a lasting partnership; culminating with the first time a COLAR unit performing bilateral training at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) in Fort Polk, Louisiana; followed by bilateral talks between the two armies at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

Arriving in Louisiana at the beginning of May, a platoon element of the elite COLAR anti-narcotics brigade integrated with the 1st Battalion, 118th Infantry Regiment of the South Carolina National Guard, in part of the 21-08 rotation to conduct tactical infantry operations, exercise interoperability, and enhance their ability to plan and execute complex maneuver operations.

“JRTC is a melting pot environment and is the culmination of brigade training – it requires units qualified and capable of going into combat after training at one of the major combat training centers of the army, “said Major General Daniel R. Walrath, Commander General of the Army South, during a June 8-10 visit to the JRTC with senior leaders of the Colombian military. “The Army of the South has many partners in the region, and the Colombian Army is one of the best. We are very proud and happy with their participation, and we hope to continue to organize this type of training events as part of an ongoing effort to strengthen our relationship with Colombia.

Emphasizing the professionalism of the Colombians during their first 48 hours in the training area known as “the box”, Sgt. 1st Class Edwin Perez, JRTC observer-controller-trainer, praised the soldiers for their high level of discipline and initiative.

“They start to move, get into position and are engaged and tuned in to what they have to do – when it’s time, it’s time for them,” Perez said. “This platoon is very aggressive and pursues the enemy during the attack. Our [U.S. Army] soldiers observe how disciplined they are and draw on their tactical knowledge.

Training with the Colombian Army is nothing new for the 1-118th Infantry Regiment, as the unit traveled to Tolemida, Colombia, in 2019 as part of Exercise Together Forward. The exercise allowed the two armies to exchange infantry doctrine while performing squad and platoon situational training scenarios. The South Carolina National Guard and the Republic of Colombia have jointly participated in the State Partnership Program since 2012, which supports the United States’ military security cooperation activities with Colombia.

“My guys can’t wait to train with the Colombians again. It was an enjoyable experience for both of us, ”said Command Sgt. Major Greg Billings. “We partnered them up with our Alpha company and they loved working together. They behaved particularly well and we are happy to have them in our training.

The unit managed to cross the language barrier by having Spanish-speaking soldiers in its ranks, which also allowed the two armies to integrate seamlessly.

“Colombians bring a different perspective on different operations and a fresh look at how to conduct different tactics,” Billings said. “They’ve spent a lot more time in the jungle than we have, and they’ve been a great asset in helping us in that regard. “

The trip to the JRTC was the first of Major General German Lopez, Colombian Army Chief of Staff for the Generation of Forces, and he viewed the training of his troops with American soldiers as a reflection of their abilities. and their commitment to the partnership with the US military.

“It is very important for our army to observe, train and learn a lot in order to improve the quality of our units,” Lopez said. “Plus, with our presence here, we want to show the world which side we’re on. This is the way we want to be globally and bring our army to another level with other armies across the world as one of the best. “

As part of improving interoperability and identifying future training opportunities with their Colombian counterparts, Army South personnel held interviews with personnel aimed at providing COLAR information regarding specific programs. of the United States Army, areas of mutual interest, and areas of modernization or reform.

Held in a hybrid fashion, the staff talks featured a COLAR delegation led by Lopez at Fort Sam Houston, and the U.S. military represented by a delegation led by Col. Jeffrey Lopez, chief cooperation officer. for the security of the southern army, in Bogota, Colombia. Prior to the executive meeting on June 8-10, the COLAR and ARSOUTH teams organized virtual and in-person working groups to develop a five-year bilateral plan for the 2021-2025 calendar year.

The five-year plan highlights the main goals of the US and Colombian armies, with Lopez agreeing to COLAR participating in a JRTC rotation in 2023, as well as hosting or participating in future Southern Vanguard exercises across the region. The US Army South and the Colombian Army have stood ready to face today’s threats and continue to develop their capabilities and interoperability to meet future challenges.

“Our staffs, as part of the staff talks, are working on a long-term plan, and we are proposing that a larger force, a company-sized formation, return to the JRTC in 2023. “Walrath said, addressing Lopez. “We believe that participating in these types of training exercises is the next step in strengthening our partnership with your military. Your soldiers and leaders make us stronger, and we also learn from you. ”

For Perez, learning from the Colombians offers soldiers in the US military a chance to raise the stakes to become the best army in the world.

“One of the things to remember is that if we in the US military call ourselves the best, we have to train hard because other countries train so hard,” said Perez. “If we’re going to partner with them (Colombians), we want to make sure we do our best every time we train together.”

Date taken: 06/15.2021
Date posted: 06/15.2021 17:40
Story ID: 399004
Location: LA, United States

Web Views: 1
Downloads: 0


Source link

]]> 0
City of Laurel celebrates 246th anniversary of the U.S. military Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:37:09 +0000

LAUREL, Mississippi (WDAM) – The town of Laurel celebrated the 246th anniversary of the United States Army on Monday as Mayor Johnny Magee signed a proclamation to commemorate Special United States Army Day.

The event brought together city officials, community members and soldiers from across the region.

SFC Dereginald Samuel was one of the soldiers in attendance and said the U.S. military has helped him in more than one way and he is happy to serve the country.

“You know, I come from a situation where it was a little difficult to be a child, but it allowed me to finish my studies and take care of my family and also to be a productive citizen in the States- United, and that’s all we all want at the end of the day, ”said Samuel.

Currently, Samuel works as a recruiter at the recruiting office on Highway 15.

The United States Army was founded on June 14, 1775, over a year before the Declaration of Independence was signed when the Continental Congress authorized the enlistment of expert sharpshooters to serve the colonies for a year.

Prior to this day, the colonies had their own militias without a unified chain of command to lead them.

The new forces consisted of 22,000 militiamen who gathered outside Boston, plus 5,000 in New York.

On June 15, 1775, George Washington of Virginia was appointed commander-in-chief and voted to raise 10 more rifle companies from other colonies.

Today, the United States military is the second largest employer in the United States with more than 1.4 million active duty men and women and 718,000 civilians. 1.1 million more serve in the National Guard and Reserve forces.

Copyright 2021 WDAM. All rights reserved.

Source link

]]> 0
Despite the drought, most of the boat launching ramps on Lake Sakakawea are expected to work | North Dakota News Sun, 13 Jun 2021 16:47:00 +0000

MINOT, ND (AP) – Popular boat launches on Lake Sakakawea in North Dakota are expected to remain in service until frost despite the dry conditions, according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.

The lake is about 6 feet lower than it was a year ago. The Corps says it is expected to peak at around 1,838 feet in late July before dropping to around 1,836 feet in late October. Even at this altitude, all major boat ramps on Lake Sakakawea are expected to remain in service, officials said.

The inflow to Sakakawea is expected to reach nearly 38,000 cubic feet per second in the coming days before declining to less than 30,000 cubic feet per second by the end of the month. The flow through the Garrison Dam power generation turbines is expected to remain at 22,000 cubic feet per second this month, meaning a slow increase will continue into July with more water entering the reservoir than outgoing, the Minot Daily New reported.

The reservoir is expected to drop several feet below current levels before one of the lake’s main boat launches becomes questionable, officials said.

Copyright 2021 The Associated press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Political cartoons

Source link

]]> 0
Mohan to take command of U.S. military support Sat, 12 Jun 2021 23:06:50 +0000

Major General Christopher O. Mohan will assume command of the U.S. Army Support Command in a ceremony at Rock Island Arsenal on Tuesday.

The ASC headquarters are located at Rock Island Arsenal, and the ASC Commanding General is designated as the RIA Senior Mission Commander.

Mohan replaces Major General Daniel G. Mitchell, who retired from the military last month. Matthew Sannito, a civilian member of the Senior Executive Service, served as NCP’s interim executive director.

Mohan will become the 11th commanding general of the ASC since the command was created in October 2006.

Mohan comes to ASC from Kaiserslautern, Germany, where he served as the commanding general of the 21st Theater Support Command.

A native of Carthage, North Carolina, Mohan was appointed an officer in 1989 after graduating from Appalachian State University in Boone, North Carolina. His postings include overseas deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as postings to Fort Bragg, North Carolina; Fort Lewis, Washington; Fort Hood, Texas; Tooele Army Depot, Utah; and Scott Air Force Base, Illinois.

Mohan also served at the Army Department Headquarters and the US Army Materiel Command Headquarters, the senior headquarters of the CSA.

In addition to his bachelor’s degree from Appalachian State, Mohan holds a master’s degree from the US Naval War College and the US Army War College.

Source link

]]> 0